Medtronic can no longer refer to the federal law preemption to bail them out of trouble for the alleged off-label marketing of their INFUSE Bone Graft product which resulted in serious injury to numerous plaintiffs; at least, not in some cases. A review by the Court of Special Appeals in Maryland concluded that based on the Medical Device Amendments Act of 1976 because the conduct of the defendant was in violation of state law.
This was major source of relief for INFUSE victims who are looking to get compensation from the manufacturer, especially for one patient who became debilitated after having INFUSE surgery to relieve chronic back pain. The surgery was done in 2008 and the patient has since needed revision surgery to address the problem of bony overgrowth.
The website of Ritter and Associates says that many lawsuits against product manufacturers are filed when the product doesn’t perform as it should. In the case of Medtronic, this happens with the off-label use of the INFUSE Bone Graft, which plaintiffs allege are with the full knowledge and even encouragement of the company. In the case detailed above, a Medtronic representative was present at the time of the surgery and was actually named in the lawsuit, along with the doctor who performed the surgery allegedly using an INFUSE cage that did not have FDA approval and an incorrect approach.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2002 approval for the use of INFUSE was based on a strict criteria precisely because the side effects with unapproved and improper use of the product outweighed any benefits it may have for the patient. The product is designed to encourage bone growth with the use of a synthetic protein, but when applied in the wrong place or overly-stimulated can result in serious harm to the patient.
If you have been seriously injured as result of using INFUSE Bone Graft or any medical device, you may have recourse under the law. Consult with a personal injury lawyer and find out more about your legal options.
Truck accidents are not as common in Delaware as it is in other states, although there was one accident in mid-2014 where three trucks were involved in a chain crash resulting in the death of the third truck driver. While not so common, any accident involving a large truck can have potentially dire consequences especially if the other vehicle is a smaller one.
In general, motorists know better than to tangle with large trucks on the highway because their weight makes it hard for them to stop, their size makes them less maneuverable than smaller vehicles, and they have huge no-zones where smaller cars simply disappear from view. But as pointed out on the website of Morris James LLP, sometimes truck drivers are less than conscientious about ensuring the safety of others by driving beyond the allowed hours-of-service, distracted, or impaired, so even if a motorist is cautious, there’s no avoiding a large truck that plows right into you.
The latest truck accident statistics for Delaware are from 2012, and it appears to be a steady trend. In 2012, there were 1,202 traffic accidents involving large trucks, with 11 fatalities and 386 injuries. This is identical for 2011, except for injuries which was 349. Overall in the US, the trend is downward, where the number of fatalities and injuries are decreasing. This is good news, except that statistics don’t really paint the true story about what happens after.
Truck accidents usually result in horrific injuries, mostly because trucks often travel at high speeds and their weight make them particularly deadly to other motorists. Additionally, most trucks transport goods and some of them are chemicals that can add to the hazards that impinge on accident victims as well as surrounding areas. At the very least, it means several days in a hospital, and most commonly means long recuperation.
If you have been seriously injured in a negligent truck accident, you will probably need to get compensation from the responsible party. Contact a truck accident lawyer in Delaware to help you get through this crisis.
Since the first two Benicar lawsuits were filed in early February 2014, more people have come forward to lodge a complaint, at least nine of which were filed and remain in the Superior Court of New Jersey instead of being transferred to federal court. All the cases have one thing in common: they allege that Daiichi Sankyo and Forest Laboratories breached their duty of care to consumers by failing to warn them about the dangers of prolonged use of Benicar.
Benicar is the brand name for olmesartan medoxomil, a formulation developed by Japanese pharmaceutical company Daiichi Sankyo for the management of hypertension. When it was first brought to the US market in 2002, it was being lauded by Sankyo and its co-promoter Forest Labs as safe and efficacious in an aggressive marketing campaign that attracted the displeasure of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on more than one occasion for making statements that could not be substantiated.
But Benicar really became a subject of serious concern when a report published in a 2012 issue of the journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings strongly suggested a causal link between Benicar and a gastrointestinal condition called sprue-like enteropathy. This presented almost identically as the immunological disorder celiac sprue (aka celiac disease) which was characterized by intolerance to gluten, a protein present in wheat, rye, and barley. It manifested as chronic diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, malnutrition and weight loss and eventually resolving into villous atrophy.
Its doppelganger exhibited the same symptoms but did not originate from the same cause and thus could not be managed the same way, which was to eliminate gluten entirely from the diet. It took quite a long time for doctors to realize that a common denominator in the sufferers of this mysterious ailment was Benicar; when it was discontinued, the symptoms disappeared. However, for many long-time users of the drug, the discovery came too late. According to http://www.williamskherkher.com/practice-areas/defective-pharmaceuticals/benicar/, many of the injuries are severe and the damage irreversible. Among these are plaintiffs that have since filed civil cases against Sankyo and Forest Labs.
If you have been similarly affected, express your concerns with your attending physician and ask for possible alternatives. You should also consult with a Benicar lawyer in your area to discuss your legal rights and options.
Feng Shui is an ancient Chinese philosophy that promotes harmony with the environment. The term has been kind of separated from its origins. For most modern humans, feng shui refers to the color and layout of furniture in a room. The goal is to have a room that is abundant in positive energy.
While “positive energy” sounds like hokey new age mumbo jumbo, there are actually numerous sensible benefits to following the practices of this old philosophy. For starters, the way the energy flows through a room can manifest itself as simply having a room that is uncluttered and navigable.
It is known in psychology that an environment’s colors can have an effect on the moods of its inhabitants. Feng shui teaches the same about the use color. Certain colors should be prevalent depending on what the space is used for.
Feng shui is a complex art whose mastery calls for a lot of study. With dedication, you too can learn to design spaces that are inviting and personal.
Individuals bothered by acne usually contend themselves with a daily dosage of pills and the application of creams which they hope will finally cure this facial skin disease that is very common among Americans, especially teens. The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) confirms the fact that acne (scientifically referred to as acne “vulgaris” or acne “of the common type”) is, indeed, a very common teen woe; it usually affects person who are in the adolescence stage, though adults too can be affected by it.
Acne can grow on the face, neck, shoulders, chest, upper arms and on the back. Teens are most prone to it due to hormonal changes, which are effects of puberty. But while others outgrow acne completely after their teenage years, there are those who continue to struggle with it, suffering even from severe facial scars in some instances.
Acne develops when the skin pores or hair follicles become clogged with too much sebum and dead skin cells. Sebum is the oil produced by the skin’s sebaceous glands (or oil glands); it serves to lubricate the skin and hair. Clogged pores can be inhabited by bacteria known as Propionibacterium acnes. Once trapped in the pores, these bacteria tend to multiply and cause swelling, redness and the beginning of acne.
Failure to treat acne correctly can lead to scarring, which may be considered a double sentence: first, for having to suffer from its presence; and, second, after it heals, it leaves scars – reminders of their once dreaded presence.
There are different forms of acne, such as:
- Mild acne, which appears in the form of whiteheads or blackheads
- Moderate acne, such as the papules or red inflamed pimples and the pustules, which are red pimples that have white centers
- Severe acne, which are painful, pus-filled lumps or cysts that cause nodules (small swellings) under the skin
The scars left by severe types of acne are more serious and are usually permanent. Thus, it is important to consult a dermatologist or a doctor for treatment to prevent acne from becoming severe. On her website, Nancy Shibayama, M.D., explains how Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) photofacials can be an effective treatment for acne, especially acne that has become immune to traditional treatment methods, like benzoyl peroxide and oral antibiotics.
The effects of IPL photofacials can last from months to years (depending on the patient’s response to the procedure). Treatments, which may be between five to six times are interspersed from one session to another; it can be two sessions in a week or once every two weeks.
Headlines are usually reserved for industrial gas explosions because they are often more devastating in terms of cost to property and human lives. But while the more mundane residential gas explosions are less catastrophic, they are ultimately more disturbing because people don’t expect to be in danger when they are at home. Those injured in an explosion in the home don’t immediately realize what happened. Gas and pipeline workers are aware of the risks of their jobs after all, while people who are sleeping in their own beds don’t expect to be woken up by an explosion in their utility rooms.
This is what happened to an elderly couple in when an improperly placed regulator and meter assembly over-pressurized, causing gas to leak and an explosion to occur a few hours after. Investigation revealed that the accident could have been prevented if federal regulations on gas utility safety had been observed.
In another incident, two tenements in East Harlem were leveled when a leak in the 127 year old natural gas cast-iron pipeline servicing the area sprung a leak, which was eventually set off to kill 8 people, injure at least 60 others, and leave more than 100 residents in nearby areas homeless. According to a Fort Worth personal injury lawyer, finding out who should be held liable for the incident can be highly complex. Investigations into the incident revealed that the residents had complained about the smell of gas some time before the explosion, and that the pipes were long-overdue for repair or replacement.
Residential gas pipelines service most homes in the US, and the lack of regular maintenance and inspection is the most common cause of dangerous leaks. Other causes of residential gas explosions can be traced to defective gas appliances and improper storage of gas tanks.
Texas has been lucky when it comes to residential gas explosions; the last recorded occurred in 1937. However, it has more than made up for it in industrial explosions, although the transformer explosions in Fort Worth were apparently caused by lightning rather than human errors.
Texas goes big in everything, and that applies to how the state frowns on insurers who do not act in good faith. State regulations exist to protect the rights of insurance policyholders when they make a claim. This is embodied in Texas Insurance Code as the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act (§ 542) and covers:
- Misrepresentation of policy facts and provisions
- Unreasonable delay in acknowledging a claim
- Failing to have and implement prompt claim investigation procedures
- Denial of fair and prompt settlement of legitimate claims
- Forcing a policy owner to file a lawsuit in order to recover the amount due under a policy’s terms
- Failing to maintain complete records of complaints
- Any practice or act determined by the commissioner to constitute unfair claim settlement
According to the website of law firm Smith Kendall PLLC in Dallas, when an insurance company acts in bad faith, it is not only a violation of the law but of the trust that policyholders place on them that when the time comes, they will be there to honor their contract. Insurance is primarily a business built on trust, so when a company betrays that trust, it is actually a bad business move.
Insurance companies that are found to act in bad faith may have their license suspended or revoked and the department may impose limits, regulations and control over the company’s business activities. The state department may also impose other sanctions as deemed applicable or enforce a cease and desist order.
Aside from government sanctions, policyholders may also file a lawsuit against the company for insurance bad faith, and recover not only the amount due in the first place, but interest on that amount as well as legal fees. If you believe that your insurer is acting in bad faith over your claim, contact an insurance bad faith lawyer in your area and present your case for assessment and appropriate action.
Imagine intending to tell a fellow lawyer about how lucky you were walking away from that car accident with nothing more than a bump in the head, and the next moment wondering why the words coming out of your own mouth make no sense.
One of the possible consequences of traumatic brain injury is aphasia, defined as the partial or total loss of language abilities. Most people take the ability to communicate for granted until they can no longer express themselves in a meaningful manner. This dysfunction affects about one million people in the US in varying types and degrees of severity depending on the cause and affected area of the brain.
There are 4 types of aphasia: expressive, receptive, anomic, and global. The most severe is global aphasia, in which the patient sustains extensive damage to the area of the brain that processes language and can no longer read, write, speak, or understand language. The mildest type of aphasia is anomic or amnesia aphasia, in which the patient has difficulty remembering the names of familiar objects, people, places or events, something that writer Stephen King calls the “dead zone” in his novel by the same name. With expressive aphasia, the patient has a problem with conveying thoughts in speech or writing while patients with receptive aphasia have difficulty in understanding language.
Losing the ability to use language even temporarily is a real problem for any human being, and since each case presents differently, there is no one treatment that is effective and prognosis is uncertain. Some recover spontaneously, but most require inhouse rehabilitation and therapy as can be found in the McAllen Medical Center in Texas to learn a whole new way of communicating i.e. drawing.
If you or an immediately family member develops aphasia or sustains other serious injuries because of the negligence of others, you may be eligible for substantial compensation. This is work for competent Massachusetts personal injury lawyers. A lawyer with a good reputation will be likely to help you through the difficult times after you or someone you care about suffers a traumatic brain injury.
An employee who sustains a workplace injury as a result of an accident or from work-related duties is entitled to make a claim for workers’ compensation for medical treatment and lost days of work. In addition, the worker is entitled to take leave without fear of losing employment under one of two laws depending on the type and extent of injury: the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) or the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Under the FMLA, the presumption is that the injured employee is coming back to work after a period of recovery. An employer has the right to require the employee to present a Fit for Duty Certification to determine if the employee is able to perform the essential functions of the job.
Fit for duty evaluations are regulated under the Code of Federal Regulations and requiring it for returning-to-work employees post-injury must be a policy that applies to all employees. Furthermore, the evaluation must only focus on areas affecting essential job functions and that the employee was made aware beforehand that such a certification would be required before he or she will be allowed to return to work.
Fit for duty evaluation is basically a functional capacity assessment designed to determine the extent and severity of the limitations that an individual may have acquired post-injury. While an employer may require this as a condition of returning to work, the assessment can also help employers pinpoint areas that need to be prioritized for injury management as well as whether a job accommodation program may be appropriate. For example, if an employee is no longer as mobile as before getting injured but the job only requires sitting in front of a computer, a telecommuting arrangement may be recommended.
Employers would be well advised to adopt such a practice for all employees. This will not only ensure the safety and health of the employee post-injury, it will help improve productivity by reducing incidence of injuries and recurring health issues.
There is a certain sentimentality in watching a train go by, which is probably why it is often featured in movies. It symbolizes progress, constancy, and steadiness. What most people fail to realize is that trains and railroads are a major means of transportation, and as such are as much at risk of accidents as road and air travel.
This is especially true for areas where the railroad and regular roads intersect. Railroad crossings are the sites of car accidents, pedestrian accidents, and employee injuries. In many cases, the accident is caused by human error such as failing to heed the warning signs, misjudging the speed of an oncoming train, or conductor error. Railroad companies and municipalities may also be negligent in ensuring the safety of the crossing with inadequate or missing warning and protective devices, poorly maintained trains and tracks, inadequate safety training and policies, or incompetent train workers.
When non-employees are injured or killed in a railroad crossing accident, federal and state law will kick in to determine liability and applicable sanctions. For example, if a railroad crossing accident occurs in Birmingham, Alabama, the victim or victim’s family will have to file a personal injury case within two years of the incident and take into consideration that Alabama follows pure contributory negligence. This means that if the victim is in any way and any degree – even 1% – responsible for the accident, no personal injury claim can be made against the responsible party. The good news is that if eligible for a claim, Alabama has no damage caps. If you are not sure if you have an actionable case, consult with a Birmingham personal injury lawyer to tell you how it is.
If a railroad employee is injured or killed while on duty, a special protection is accorded to the victim under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) if the employee has no workers’ compensation insurance coverage. FELA allows the injured worker to sue companies for personal injury or relatives of the victim for wrongful death. However, the employee first has to prove that the railroad was legally negligent before it will award full compensation.